A key factor in many business models is
getting advertisers to spend on net radio. Gavin Starks, Chairman
of the Internet Webcasters Association (Europe) reckons : "You've
got to educate the advertisers themselves. Say: 'We have an audience,
this is the demographic, the cost and this is what your return
is.' Things like Measurecast
really help because we can do a like for like comparison of the
number of people listening online, measure the duration they've
been listening for and the audience reach - something traditional
RAJAR stats don't let you do."
In fact the information available to
advertisers is more detailed than you might imagine. Denise Reiling
of Adsertion, who match advertisers with net radio audiences,
says: "When a listener comes on we know a few things about them
- we know their gender, zip code, country, age, email address
- so we know what ads they have been served and we can fine tune
and send them specific types of advertisements."
The advertiser can then receive very detailed
feedback: "One of the big advantages is in the ability to report
back to the advertiser on how many people actually saw or listened
to the ad. In standard radio you are just guessing," says Denise.
This profiling is key, according to Streaming
specialist Craig Moehl of Groovy Gecko: "This means it is going
to make the cost of net radio a lot more affordable - they can
charge the advertisers a premium for the CPM (cost per thousand),
because the thousand people listening are going to be the thousand
people that the advertiser really wants to get hold of.".
In the UK RAJAR monitor radio audiences
and have been including Internet listening in their figures since
2000 - Jane O'Hara is not so convinced the market is ready: "We
did a couple of pilot studies last year - if people said they
had listened to radio via the Internet we asked them to fill in
the names of the stations from the previous seven days. What we
found was because listening was spread amongst so many different
stations, that no station gets particularly high audiences at
the moment.. The data ultimately wasn't usable."
Paul Maloney, Editor of Radio and Internet
Newsletter (RAIN)
thinks the answer lies in combining efforts: "I think it will
be more than just ratings of individual stations, it will be about
networks of stations. If I buy onto this 'network' then I am going
to get 100 different stations and millions of impressions for
my ads."
The unique profile of net radio listeners
is something that could be taken advantage of, says Mike O'Brien
of the Radio Advertising Bureau:
"At the moment net radio listening habits are slightly different
to normal analogue listening habits in that a lot of people listen
at work. In that sense it's an area where they stand out - that
is an opportunity for the advertiser." He added: "Reach and listening
hours are both growing rapidly, and with some advertisers already
using Internet Radio we can expect growth."
However, Stormdb's David Richardson continues
to sound a note of caution: "I think the Internet as a whole has
had a problem with advertising to an extent - perhaps it has had
a problem being taken seriously - and it's up against some very
stiff competition where advertisers are more used to spending
their money."